Norton register vista

You will have to enter the key again. Your email address will not be published. Instructions font-size: 13px! Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Other netizens dotted around the web have complained that they find it difficult to uninstall the Norton cryptominer. We have asked Norton for comment and will update this article when we hear back from the biz. According to the company's FAQ, the function must be activated by the users themselves and requires powerful hardware to meet its system requirements.

The cryptominer is signposted during installation of Norton , though given the well-documented phenomenon of folks speedily clicking away EULAs, it's entirely likely non-technical users are unknowingly enabling it and then complaining about suddenly slow-running PCs due to a cryptominer technically running with their permission.

Uninstalling it altogether takes a bit more persistence, it appears, with users needing to disable Norton Product Tamper Protection intended to protect the antivirus product from being disabled or deleted by malware before going through the usual Windows uninstallation steps. Norton isn't alone: last year a maker of Wi-Fi routers offered to mine cryptocurrency on users' devices if they supplied connectivity to the general public.

Norton has been in touch to say: "Norton Crypto is an opt-in feature only and is not enabled without user permission. If users have turned on Norton Crypto but no longer wish to use the feature, it can be disabled through Norton by temporarily shutting off "tamper protection" which allows users to modify the Norton installation and deleting NCrypt. In conjunction with a White House meeting on Thursday at which technology companies discussed the security of open source software, Google proposed three initiatives to strengthen national cybersecurity.

The meeting was arranged last month by US national security adviser Jake Sullivan, amid the scramble to fix the Log4j vulnerabilities that occupied far too many people over the holidays. Sullivan asked invited firms — a group that included Amazon, Apple, Google, IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle — to share ideas on how the security of open source projects might be improved. Google chief legal officer Kent Walker in a blog post said that just as the government and industry have worked to shore up shoddy legacy systems and software, the Log4j repair process — still ongoing — has demonstrated that open source software needs the same attention as critical infrastructure.

Apple's having a problem retaining top chip personnel, with the latest defection being CPU architect Mike Filippo going to Microsoft. As chief compute architect at Microsoft, Filippo will design server chips for the software giant, according to media reports. The US Federal Communications Commission is considering imposing stricter rules requiring telecommunications carriers to report data breaches to customers and law enforcement more quickly.

At the moment, companies have to wait seven business days before they can disclose a data breach to their customers. Under the new plan, the waiting period will be scrapped altogether so people can be notified sooner. Two serious security vulnerabilities were recently found in AWS services, but because they were responsibly reported and the cloud biz responded quickly, no harm appears to have been done.

On Thursday, Orca Security published details about Superglue and BreakingFormation , vulnerabilities in AWS Glue and AWS Cloud Formation that allowed attackers to access data for other customers and to access files and make server-side requests to internal web services infrastructure.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service for preparing data for subsequent processing. But thanks to an internal misconfiguration, Orca Security researchers were able to obtain more information than should have been allowed. Although the companies faced the highest attrition rates in three years and were forced to raise hiring targets, increasing use of technology during the pandemic has given a wide range of verticals a reason to shift from data centres to the cloud.

In turn, the pandemic's subsequent digitisation race has presented the IT consulting companies with a thriving market. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC will hike capital spending by a nearly third in to build out production capacity in the expectation that demand for chips keeps flooding in.

The top line was driven by demand for semiconductors manufactured with TSMC's 5nm process technology. Sure, no more "regular updates of new program versions with new features" are to be expected as with a few other security software vendors , but to revoke any valid subscriptions and stop feeding definitions etc. That would certainly deem over-excessive, ridiculous and incomprehensible -- as if NLL is trying to punish or berate any customer who is in such dire situation.

And seriously, does it really take too much resource to just maintain and manage valid subscriptions under such circumstances? I don't think so -- as exemplified by those other vendors.

Meanwhile, even Kaspersky would still honor a valid subscription activation key to be run on the last XP-compatible version v18 or 19, both still downloadable from Kaspersky -- as long as such keys are purchased at the official Kaspersky online store. I feel that that company is still being honest, resourceful and trying to fulfill some sort of social responsibility to all affected users in question.

But nothing like that with the current state of NLL; only scare tactics, white terror, confusing notices, and such. And what's more, NO direct offline installer links for all legacy versions v Thanks for the comment about Kaspersky. I found a support article on the Kaspersky support site at Compatibility of Kaspersky Applications with Windows XP last updated Jun and it includes links to v I don't think so -- as exemplified by those other vendors Even if companies like Kaspersky are able to renew their expiring SHA-1 code signing certificates in the future, I imagine their legal departments would have concerns that their company was continuing to support legacy security software that no longer meets current security standards.

At some point the risk of a serious breach of their malware protection is going to outweigh the benefit of the income these companies can generate by selling subscriptions to Win XP and Vista users. I ran it through the 'Virus Total File Scanner'. To run the file, or not to run the file. That is the question? Observations welcomed. ITMA The said Notron removal tool is a powerful one that would, at the extremes, remove all traces of all Norton products from your system. That probably involves deep scanning and manipulation of your system's various sources, registries, and such.

Maybe such actions would provoke a false alarm on those 69 virus scanning engines? That's highly possible. As for Kaspersky And Dr. Web , maybe this firm has better resources eg. Anyway just my 0. VFS Results indicate The other 69 results flag, OK.

If the file is reported as "undetected" by a scan engine in the VirusTotal report then that means the file SHA hash has already been whitelisted as a known "safe" file in their virus definition database.